






research and process
MAGCD U2 W1-2
Feedback notes
What’s working?
– Good visual effect and attempt
– The point of legibility research works
What’s not working?
– You didn’t set rules for the practice, so it’s confusing to have so many different shapes
– You should catalogue them well, to be more systematic with iterations
– In the second week approach, the basic shape is not a standard M
How to develop?
– It looks like a game, try to use the zine to show your works
– Thinking about how shape can affect legibility
– Thinking about the basic meaning of letter
– Try to put them in a sentence
– Do more research about the foundation of typography and about symbol and meaning
– Setting some rules and do the iteration more slightly
Reflection
For the iterative process, I should set up some rules for myself before I do it so that I can do the project in a systematic way and be clearer when presenting and expressing it.
The first two weeks of the iteration I concentrated on the study of typographic form, looking at the impact of morphological change on legibility. From a linguistic point of view, I want to delve into the symbolic representation of type. From a personal identity perspective, I also want to incorporate some elements of Chinese and Western culture.