I chose the materials from a walking experience in London, these include 1 photos, 2 a conversation between me and my friend during the walk and 3 map.
At first, my aim is quite simple, finding a way to visualise the experience in London.
Here are 100 iterations: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Cd3SxPLr_9zxFi4UvDqiIIhf09n2Q4U3/view?usp=sharing
Publication
Working
1. there are many methods be used, like deleting / missing / cutting / disruption in reading. And the abstract shape can show the missing of memory.
2.weaving is interesting.
Not working
1.the emotional part is not shown
2.more like ideology, too much for iterations, so choose one of two directions
Self- reflection
During this process, there seemed to be too many topics I wanted to discuss, such as memories, experiences or life in London. I feel uncertain and the enquiry "HOW TO VISUALISE AN EXPERIENCE IN LONDON" is definitely too vague. So for the Week2 work, I choose the "weaving" which interested me more to be the direction to going on. Why weaving? In the face of the increasingly powerful AI, I have a negative attitude. I think actually that most of the digital work can be replaced. So choosing a manual experiment method is a tiny insistence on expressing the human part.